Turn to History before You Speak

After the Tibet riot in March, the bombs from western government and media finally explode. However, the fuse here is not the Olympic Game to be held in Beijing. Those who propagate an independent Tibet have made good use of the torch rally outside China and created a perfect chance for the western government and media to put pressure on Chinese government on not merely the Tibet issue.
This is politics, rather than pure human rights, sovereignty or anything else. The reason I say so is based on the fact that facts and history are not upheld at the first position before those people who speak out or protest. The fame of the western “free” and “independent” media is to some extent destroyed by their biased report. Some obvious evidence is provided by www.anti-cnn.com.
It is also quite regretful that many people support the protest against the torch rally without a clear knowledge of the relationship between Olympic and politics and the history of the complex Tibet issue.
Although the governments of many countries recognize that Tibet is a part of China, many ordinary people do not really understand why. What more, the long history of the Dalai Lama’s biased propaganda and the distrust of the communist regime due to the historical reasons made the westerners stand out without really look into the issue.
The complexity of the Tibet problem is not something can be simply illustrated by the nationalism or the separatism. There are a lot more behind.
How to find out the truth? If you don’t trust the viewpoint from Chinese Han, then you should not trust the viewpoint from exiled Tibetans. The reason rises from the possible bias which you fear that might mislead you. Go back to read those third parties’ description and introduction about the issues happening at their own times.
I come across an article about the establishment of the present Gelug branch of the Tibetan Buddhism. Although it is in Chinese, it refers to a lot of authoritative western scholars’ research and experience. I would like to regard it as quite neutral. You can find it at
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!_4qwYw6ZGQQ0SgBMthp8sw--/article?mid=2358&prev=2359&next=2357.
If you cannot read Chinese, I hope that you can try to read several books:
1. Tucci, Giuseppi, Tibetan Painted Scrolls, Libreria dello Sta to, Rome, 1949
2. Petech, Luciano, China and Tibet in the Early XVIIIth Century: History of the Establishment of Chinese Protectorate in Tibet, 2nd Ed. T'oung Pao Monographie I,E.J.Brill, Leiden 1972
3. Goldstein, Melvyn C. A History of Modern Tibet,University of California 1989
Do remember to turn to history before you speak.